Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Assignment of Courtrooms, Judge's Offices, and Other Court Facilities of the St. Joseph Superior Court

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 1999No. 71S00-9901-MF-57PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

I. Procedural background

Indiana Trial Rule 60.5 establishes procedures to resolve intra-county disputes about the funding for court operations. These procedures are infrequently invoked in Indiana. In this case, however, the extraordinary procedures of Trial Rule 60.5 have been employed to settle a rather ordinary dispute over which judge uses a particular office in the St. Joseph County Courthouse. 1

In short, the Board of Commissioners of St. Joseph County (“Commissioners”) want to relocate the magistrate of the Circuit Court to a particular room of the County Courthouse; the presiding judge…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Board of Commissioners v. StoutIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  2. State Ex Rel. Glenn v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Morgan Circuit Court v. Morgan County CouncilIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Silkey v. Investors Diversified Services, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. In Re Mandate of Funds for the Brown Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pohl v. United Airlines, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1999
  2. In Re Mandate of Funds for Center Township of Marion County Small Claims Court Order for Mandate and Mandate of FundsIndiana Supreme Court · 2013
  3. St. Joseph County Commissioners v. NemethIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Gilda Orange, Members of the Common Council of the City of East Chicago, Ind. v. Hon. Sonya A. MorrisIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. In the Matter of Mandate of Funds St. Joseph County Commissioners and St. Joseph County Council v. The Hon. Peter J. Nemeth and the St. Joseph Probate CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API