Legal Opinion

Moody v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 14, 2001No. 45A03-0008-PC-270PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RILEY, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Appellant Defendant, Karl R. Moody (Moody), appeals the denial of his Petition for Post Conviction Relief.

We affirm.

ISSUE

Moody raises one issue on appeal, which we restate as follows: whether he received ineffective assistance of trial and appellate counsel.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

We adopt this court’s statement of facts as set forth in Moody v. State, No. 45A03-9201-CR-027, slip op. at 2, 597 N.E.2d 394 *67(Ind.Ct.App. July 8, 1992). The facts are as follows:

On January 28,1988, Moody and Dew-rell Hobson II were engaged in a basketball game at Lincoln…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Woods v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Ben-Yisrayl v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Spranger v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Willoughby v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Koons v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Walker v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Walker v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Thompson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API