Legal Opinion

Goodman v. Darden, Doman & Stafford Associates

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 29, 1982No. 9363-1-IPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Durham, A.C.J.

This is an appeal from an order that respondent John Goodman need not take part in arbitration proceedings arising out of a contract which he had signed as president of a corporation "in formation." Goodman had arranged with Darden, Doman & Stafford Associates (DDS), a general partnership, to renovate a Tacoma apartment building purchased by DDS. During the negotiations Goodman decided to incorporate and so informed DDS. The contract was ultimately executed between DDS and "Building Design and Development Inc. (In formation), John A. Goodman, President." Work was to be completed…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Johnson v. NasiWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Stap v. Chicago Aces Tennis Team, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  3. H. F. Philipsborn & Co. v. SusonIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Refrigeration Engineering Co. v. McKayCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971
  5. White & Bollard, Inc. v. GoodenowWashington Supreme Court · 1961

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Goodman v. Darden, Doman & Stafford AssociatesWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Garcia Ex Rel. Garcia v. Middle Rio Grande Conservancy DistrictNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Ikuno v. YipCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  4. Ikuno v. YipCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  5. Goodman v. Darden, Doman & Stafford AssociatesWashington Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API