Legal Opinion
Salaz v. City of Tucson
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided August 15, 1988No. 2 CA-CV 87-0259PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FERNANDEZ, Judge.
The issue on appeal in this inverse condemnation case is the propriety of the court’s award of attorney’s fees against the City of Tucson. On cross-appeal, the issue presented is the propriety of the court’s dismissal of appellee Evaristo Sa-laz’s cause of action against the City brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. We reverse the award of attorney’s fees and affirm the dismissal.
This case arose out of the construction of water drainage improvements on the Coronado Ridge Wash. Salaz owned property located directly across Speedway Boulevard from a large parcel of land…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lake Country Estates, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Thomas E. Foster and Georgia Lee Foster, and Cross-Appellants v. City of Detroit, Michigan, and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
- Thomas E. Foster v. Mark Herley, Director of the Detroit Housing Commission, Detroit Housing Commission, City of Detroit, MichiganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. O'BrienCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. FrohmillerArizona Supreme Court · 1951
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Calmat of Arizona v. State Ex Rel. MillerArizona Supreme Court · 1993
- City of Casa Grande v. Arizona Water Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- Calmat of Arizona v. STATE EX REL., MILLERCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
- Dos Picos Land Ltd. Partnership v. Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- DOS PICOS LAND LTD. v. Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.