Legal Opinion
System Fuels, Inc. v. United States 0
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided April 23, 2013No. 03-2623CPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Post-trial decision in a remanded case involving the Standai’d Contract for pickup of spent nuclear fuel; application of the 1987 industry-wide acceptance rate; causation; costs of mitigation for partial breach; avoided costs
OPINION AND ORDER
LETTOW, Judge.
The Department of Energy (“DOE”) has failed to fulfill its contractual obligation to collect and dispose of spent nuclear fuel (“SNF”) and high-level radioactive waste (“HLW ”) generated at the two-unit Arkansas Nuclear One (“ANO”) power plant located at Russellville, Arkansas. Plaintiffs, System Fuels, Inc. and Entergy Arkansas, Inc.…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- In Re Sanford Fork & Tool Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Indiana Michigan Power Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Energy Capital Corp. (As General Partner of Energy Capital Partners Limited Partnership) v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Laitram Corporation, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Nec Corporation and Nec Technologies Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- System Fuels, Inc. and Entergy Arkansas, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- System Fuels, Inc. and Entergy Arkansas, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014