System Fuels, Inc. and Entergy Arkansas, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
Post-trial decision in “Phase II” spent nuclear fuel ease; causation; but-for world regarding incurred costs of characterizing and loading; obstruction by government through refusal to answer discovery requests; seismic stability analyses and mitigation; payroll loader allocation; property taxes; offset
OPINION AND ORDER 1
LETTOW, Judge.
This ease constitutes the second phase of litigation between the parties regarding damages for the Department of Energy’s (“DOE’s”) breach of its obligation to dispose of spent nuclear fuel (“SNF”) and high-level radioactive waste (“HLW”) generated at the…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- San Carlos Irrigation and Drainage District v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Indiana Michigan Power Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Bluebonnet Savings Bank, F.S.B., Stone Capital, Inc. (Formerly Known as Cfsb Corporation), and James M. Fail v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Energy Capital Corp. (As General Partner of Energy Capital Partners Limited Partnership) v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Landmark Land Company, Inc. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. United States, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- System Fuels, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Entergy Gulf States, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Entergy Nuclear Indian Point 2, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- System Fuels, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Dairyland Power Cooperative v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.