Legal Opinion

Newmark v. National Bank & Trust Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1955Published

1Opinion of the CourtMorris Eder, J.

Defendants move pursuant to subdivision 2 of rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice to dismiss the complaint on the ground that it appears on the face thereof that plaintiff does not have legal capacity to sue defendants.

The complaint alleges: That plaintiff was appointed successor trustee in 1953 pursuant to a trust agreement originally made in 1940 to secure the payment of corporate bonds between defendant bank and a New York corporation, a copy of which is annexed; that pursuant to said agreement defendant bank *1023as trustee was granted and received all the assets, real and personal, of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Loehr v. East Side Omnibus Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  2. Loehr v. East Side Omnibus CorporationNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  3. Shipley v. SchmitzerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
  4. Fitzgerald v. BigalowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  5. Kaluszer Young Men's Benevolent Society, Inc. v. Independent Young Men's Sick Benevolent Society, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API