Legal Opinion

Fitzgerald v. Bigalow

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 30, 1937PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and matter remitted to the Special Term to proceed in accordance with the memorandum. Memorandum: A motion may be made under subdivision 6 of rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice whether or not the defendant has answered. This was not formerly the law because of section 282 of the Civil Practice Act, which, however, was repealed on March 16, 1932 (Laws of 1932, chap. 224). We held to the same effect in Crocker v. Ireland (235 App. Div. 760), although the point was not mentioned in the memorandum or in the briefs. The complaint…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Reilly v. . Sicilian Asphalt Paving Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1902
  2. Crocker v. IrelandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Loehr v. East Side Omnibus Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  2. Halucha v. Jockey ClubNew York Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Newmark v. National Bank & Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API