Legal Opinion

Hoeflich v. Chemical Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 25, 1987PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Walter M. Schackman, J.), entered December 12, 1986, denying plaintiff-appellant Betty Sachs Hoeflich’s motion for summary judgment against defendant-respondent Chemical Bank, as executor of the estate of Marvin L. Hoeflich, unanimously reversed, on the law, and plaintiff-appellant’s motion for summary judgment is granted, without costs.

Plaintiff-appellant, Betty Hoeflich, and her late husband, Marvin Hoeflich, married in October 1971. They entered into a separation agreement in April 1973, which survived their divorce. The agreement provided that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Intercontinental Planning, Ltd. v. Daystrom Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Cohen v. CroninNew York Court of Appeals · 1976

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Matter of RicondaNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Hoeflich v. Chemical BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  3. In re the Estate of RicondaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API