Legal Opinion

State v. Mix

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 25, 2002No. C1-02-288PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GORDON W. SHUMAKER, Judge.

Appellant John Allen Mix challenges the district court’s order denying his motion for a four-week continuance to reschedule sentencing before the judge who accepted his guilty plea and who sentenced two of Mix’s co-conspirators. Mix appeals his sentence and seeks a remand for re-sentencing or, alternatively, a reduction of his sentence. We affirm.

FACTS

The state charged Kevin Lopez, Joseph Wersinger, Sarah Heaslip, and appellant John Allen Mix with various controiled-substance crimes relating to the manufacture of methamphetamine.

Wersinger pleaded guilty before…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. KindemSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  2. State v. RainerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  3. STATE, CTY. OF HENNEPIN v. McClaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  4. State v. GilbertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  5. State v. HoelzelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. MeredykCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
  2. State v. MeredykCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API