Legal Opinion

Ashlock v. Liberty Glass Co.

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided March 10, 1987No. 66937PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BACON, Judge.

Worker filed a claim for lung damage two and one-half years after his last hazardous exposure with Employer. Worker left Employer’s employment on March 31, 1983, and filed his claim on January 6, 1986.

When the case came on for trial, the trial judge indicated that he felt that the claim *1026was barred by the two-year statute of limitations as a matter of law. 85 O.S.Supp. 1986 § 43(A). That is, the judge felt that any claim filed after two years is now barred as a matter of law.

Worker then made an offer of proof which consisted of a showing that he first became aware of the fact that…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Munsingwear, Inc. v. TullisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  2. Smedley v. State Industrial CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
  3. Buntin v. Sheffield SteelCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1985

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Knott v. Halliburton ServicesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  2. SHEPARD v. OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONSSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
  3. Knott v. Halliburton ServicesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  4. SHEPARD v. OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONSSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API