Legal Opinion

Janis v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 30, 1974No. 1 CA-IC 950PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EUBANK, Judge.

We issued our writ of certiorari to review the findings and order of the Industrial Commission which dismissed the petitioner’s (claimant) “Petition for Review” because it was not timely filed.

The claimant raises two contentions on appeal, (1) that the dismissal of the “Petition for Review” was improper, and (2) that the award of the hearing officer was not supported by the law and the evidence. *548It is clear that if the claimant prevails on his first contention the case must be remanded to the Commission in order for it to conduct the appropriate review, while, on the other hand,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Parsons v. Bekins FreightArizona Supreme Court · 1972
  2. McCormick v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Taylor v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
  4. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Swatzell v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Janis v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Janis v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API