Legal Opinion

Swatzell v. Industrial Commission

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1954No. 5926PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UDALL, Justice.

This is a “no insurance” case. Petitioner, Russell C. Swatzell, invoked the remedy ■afforded under the provisions of Section 56-947, A.C.A.1939, which ■ prescribes the liability of an employer failing to comply with the Arizona Workmen’s Compensation Law, Art. 9, Chapter 56, A.C.A. 1939, as amended, and more particularly Section 56-932 thereof. Respondent, the Industrial Commission of Arizona, acting in its quasi-judicial capacity, concluded that it was without jurisdiction in the premises arid entered an award dismissing petitioner’s claim for compensation. By certiorari its…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Davis v. Department of Labor and Industries of Wash.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Harrison v. LaveenArizona Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Begay v. MillerArizona Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Eagle Indemnity Co. v. HadleyArizona Supreme Court · 1950

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. McCormick v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Johnson v. Kerr-McGee Oil Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
  3. Tibbetts v. Leech Lake Reservation Business CommitteeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  4. Rios v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  5. White Mountain Apache Tribe v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API