Penuel v. Titan/Value Equities Group, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
BUTTLER, S. J.
Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment entered for defendants after the trial court granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment on the grounds that the facts do not support a claim under ORICO, and because, even if they do, this action was not commenced within the five-year statute of limitations applicable to such claims. We consider the latter claim first. On review of summary judgment, we state the facts that were before the trial court in the light most favorable to plaintiffs. Seeborg v. General Motors Corporation, 284 Or 695, 588 P2d 1100 (1978).
The father of plaintiffs…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- National Organization for Women, Inc. v. ScheidlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Seeborg v. General Motors CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Gaston v. ParsonsOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- United States National Bank of Oregon v. DaviesOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Chaney v. Fields Chevrolet Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Siragusa v. BrownNevada Supreme Court · 1998
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. SmithDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1995
- Keller v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- State v. PierceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- Oregon Life & Health Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. Inter-Regional Financial Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.