Legal Opinion

Keller v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 9, 2005No. 0010-10816; A117518PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*453DEITS, J. pro tempore

Plaintiffs appeal after the trial court granted summary judgment to defendants on plaintiffs’ claims for injuries related to plaintiff Lawrence Keller’s exposure to asbestos.1 The trial court held that the claims were barred by ORS 30.907, the applicable statute of limitations. We reverse.

Because we are reviewing summary judgment in defendants’ favor, we state the facts in the light most favorable to plaintiff and draw all reasonable inferences in his favor. ORCP 47 C; Jones v. General Motors Corp., 325 Or 404, 420, 939 P2d 608 (1997). Plaintiff worked as a automobile…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Jones v. General Motors Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Berry v. BrannerOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Stevens v. BisphamOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Gaston v. ParsonsOregon Supreme Court · 1994

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Keller v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Keller v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  3. Marshall v. PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLPCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  4. Bixby v. KBR, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2012
  5. Lane County School District 4J v. Oregon School Activities Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API