Legal Opinion

Range v. Davison

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1928No. Docket No. 2PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

Plaintiffs filed this bill for the purpose of quieting title to a 30-acre tract of land lying west of the city of Royal Oak on the Eleven Mile road in Royal Oak township, Oakland county. All defendants except Albert Lothamer and Harry H. Simpson appear to have been disinterested and allowed the case to go by default. Lothamer answered in explanation and denial of any interest in the property, asking dismissal of plaintiffs’ bill as to him; while Simpson answered issuably, with a cross-bill asking affirmative relief by decree for specific performance of a land contract for said property…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Waller v. LiebermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  2. McEwan v. OrtmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Lackovic v. CampbellMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Hedrick v. FirkeMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Pangburn v. SiffordMichigan Supreme Court · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Muirhead v. FreimannMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Jenkins v. U.S.A. Foods, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1996
  3. Policha v. VossMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Barth v. Women's City ClubMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Steven Hubbard v. GeoStar Financial ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API