Legal Opinion

Walker v. San Francisco Housing Authority

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 26, 2002No. A095476PublishedCited by 4 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

REARDON, J.

In the face of flagrant discovery abuse, the trial court ordered terminating sanctions against appellant S an Francisco Housing Authority (SFHA). After entry of default judgment against it, SFHA submitted an affidavit of attorney fault, moving unsuccessfully to set aside the default judgment pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure 1 section 473, subdivision (b) (section 473(b)). On appeal, SFHA assails both the order for terminating sanctions and the denial of its motion to set aside the default judgment. We affirm.

I. Factual Background

A. The Underlying Lawsuit

In September 1998…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jovine v. FHP, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Reisman v. ShahverdianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  3. McCartney v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Strathvale Holdings v. E.B.H.California Court of Appeal · 2005
  2. Kern County Department of Child Support Services v. CamachoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  3. Gridley v. GridleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  4. Orange County Department of Child Support Services v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API