Legal Opinion
City of Myrtle Beach v. Juel P. Corp.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided March 12, 2001No. 25261PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BURNETT, Justice:
This case involves the proper construction of a Myrtle Beach city ordinance concerning abandoned and obsolete signs. Myrtle Beach Code § 902.4.7. We granted certiorari to review a decision of the Court of Appeals holding petitioners’ sign could be deemed abandoned regardless of petitioners’ intent. City of Myrtle Beach v. Juel P. Corp. and Gay Dolphin, Inc., 337 S.C. 157, 522 S.E.2d 153 (Ct.App.1999). We reverse.
FACTS
In the early 1970s, petitioners purchased Ed’s Hobby Shop in Myrtle Beach. The shop includes a rooftop sign, which is arguably the most prominent sign location…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Charleston County Parks & Recreation Commission v. SomersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
- First Baptist Church of Mauldin v. City of MauldinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
- Purdy v. MOISESupreme Court of South Carolina · 1953
- Conway v. CITY OF GREENVILLE, SCSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1970
- City of Myrtle Beach v. Juel P. Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
3Cited by8 opinions
- Olson v. Faculty House of Carolina, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
- Denene, Inc. v. City of CharlestonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
- Jones v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
- Wehle v. SOUTH CAROLINA RETIREMENT SYSTEMSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
- Boehm v. Town of Sullivan's Island Bd. of Zoning AppealsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2018
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.