Doe v. Horne
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Helen Doe, et al., No. CV-23-00185-TUC-JGZ 10 Plaintiffs, ORDER 11 v. 12 Thomas C Horne, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike Defendant Horne’s Demand 16 for Jury Trial. (Doc. 156.) Defendant Horne has filed a Response and a Cross-Motion for 17 Advisory Jury. (Doc. 159.) The motions are fully briefed. (Docs. 161, 163.) For the 18 following reasons, the Court will grant the Motion to Strike the Demand for Jury Trial and 19 Deny the Motion for Advisory Jury. 20…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Tull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- City of Monterey v. Del Monte Dunes at Monterey, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Danjaq LLC v. Sony Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Glenda Smith and Ray Martin v. Howard Barton, Larry Barnes, Jack Ugaki, and Brian WardleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Richard W. Barber, Personal Representative of the Estate of Barbara W. Reese, Deceased v. John J. Ruth and Lucille A. RuthCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.