Legal Opinion
Glenda Smith and Ray Martin v. Howard Barton, Larry Barnes, Jack Ugaki, and Brian Wardle
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 19, 1990No. 88-4230PublishedCited by 154 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EDWARD C. REED, Jr., Chief District Judge:
OVERVIEW
This is an action for damages, injunctive and declaratory relief brought by Glenda Smith 1 and Ray Martin. Smith and Martin were former employees of the Idaho Commission for the Blind (the “Commission”). They contend that a restructuring of the Commission, whereby both plaintiffs lost their jobs, violated their rights under section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 794 (Supp.1990) (the “Rehabilitation Act”). Further, plaintiffs brought claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for alleged violations of their First Amendment right to free…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Maine v. ThiboutotSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by154 opinions
- Emily Snead v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Company, a Delaware Corporation James McIntoshCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Scot L. Zimmerman v. State of Oregon Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Parker v. Universidad De Puerto RicoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- Tayler Bayer v. Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Jeffrey B. Newman v. Ghs Osteopathic, Inc., Parkview Hospital Division. Jeffrey B. NewmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
149 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.