Legal Opinion

Wright Co. v. Haralson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 22, 1935No. 24965PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGuerry, J.

1. This was a bail-trover action to recover “one only 604-224 BEER BAR complete with tapping equipment and pressure regulator” (italics ours), sold by the plaintiff to the defendant. The defendant filed a plea that the property was sold to him for the purpose of operating a beer saloon and to sell what is commonly known as “3.2” beer; that this purpose was well known to plaintiff; and that, the same being in violation of the laws of Georgia, the courts would not aid the parties entering into such a contract. By amendment the plaintiff alleged that the contract retaining title contained the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Garrison v. BurnsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  2. Harris v. Barfield Music HouseCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
  3. Howard Piano Co. v. GloverCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
  4. Abbott Furniture Co. v. MobleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1914

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Shannondoah, Inc. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  2. Columbus Wine Co. v. SheffieldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API