Legal Opinion

Garrison v. Burns

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided August 18, 1896PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Equitable petition. Before Judge Hardeman. Bibb superior court. November term, 1895.

1Opinion of the Court

Lumpkin, Justice.

This was an equitable petition, the grounds of which need. not be stated, brought by James Burns against V. A. Garrison to rescind a contract and recover certain personalty, consisting largely of bar-room fixtures and appurtenances. There was a verdict for the plaintiff, and Garrison made a motion for a new trial, to. the overruling of which he excepted. The following facts affirmatively appear from the evidence introduced by the plaintiff: Before the sale to Garrison, Bums had been engaged in the retail liquor business in the city of Macon. For this pur*763pose lie had taken ont…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Howell ex rel. Jones v. FountainSupreme Court of Georgia · 1847
  2. Adams v. BarrettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1848
  3. Clarke, Harrison & Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
  4. Ingram v. MitchellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1860
  5. Heineman v. NewmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Quillian v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Sewell v. NorrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  3. Jones v. DinkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
  4. Columbus Wine Co. v. SheffieldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
  5. Smith v. NixSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API