Legal Opinion

Mock v. Johnson

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 5, 1923No. 1532PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMYTH, Chief Justice.

This is an interference proceeding relating to an improvement in a carbureter designed to effect economy in the consumption of fuel by the motor to which it is applied. The issue involves three counts. We give count 1:

In a carbureter, a carbureting chamber having a throttle-controlled mixture outlet and air and fuel inlets, a constant level chamber supplying said fuel inlet with liquid fuel, and means operating with the throttle to control the pressure in said constant level chamber for restricting the flow of fuel upon intermediate suctions and permitting full flow on…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chandler v. MockCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1945
  2. Chandler v. Mock. Mock v. ChandlerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
  3. Crabbs v. WardellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API