Legal Opinion

Penwitt v. City of Chicago

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 24, 1942No. Gen. No. 41,839PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kiley

This is an action for personal- injuries to plaintiff. The jury returned a verdict in his favor for $2,500. Defendant’s motions for a directed verdict and a new trial were overruled and judgment entered on the verdict. The City has appealed.

On June 26, 1937, at about 10:45 a.m., Clarence Penwitt, 34 years old, was injured by an automobile in Green street, Chicago. At the time of the injury and before, for several blocks, plaintiff was seated on the cross-bar .of a bicycle of an acquaintance Hendricks who was propelling the bicycle and had volunteered to take plaintiff home. Plaintiff was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Briske v. Village of BurnhamIllinois Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Streeter v. HumrichouseIllinois Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Linehan v. MortonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1921
  4. McKinley v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1939
  5. Perry v. People's Gas Light & Coke Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1905

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Magill v. GeorgeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1952
  2. Davis v. Tampico Farmers Mutual Telephone Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1947
  3. Bolek v. West Shore Transport Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API