Legal Opinion
Allen v. Diebold, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided November 24, 1992No. 5:91 CV 2450PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SAM H. BELL, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Currently before the court are numerous motions, filed by the defendant, for dismissal or for summary judgment. The defendant seeks judgment on both the federal ADEA claims and, as well, the pendent claims advanced in plaintiffs’ complaint. While the first dispositive motion was filed early this year, since that time, amended pleadings have necessitated the filing of additional and supplementary briefs and motions. Because all these documents speak to the issues at hand, they are here considered in full, for the purposes of ruling upon the…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Glenn Allen v. Diebold, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Newsom v. Textron AerostructuresCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
- Slusser v. Vantage Builders, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2013
- Kupferschmidt v. RunyonDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1993
- Campau v. Orchard Hills Psychiatric CenterDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.