Legal Opinion
Glenn Allen v. Diebold, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided September 6, 1994No. 93-3012PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MERRITT, Chief Judge.
In this age discrimination appeal, the theory of the plaintiffs’ case is that their employer replaced two unionized Ohio manufacturing plants with two new non-union plants in Virginia and South Carolina in order to replace several hundred older Ohio workers with approximately 100 younger workers at the new plants. At the Ohio plants 80% of the workers were over 40, but 83% of the new workers at the new plants were under 40. Approximately sixty of the older workers filed suit. They argue that the district court erred when it dismissed their claims on statute of limitations…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Furnco Construction Corp. v. WatersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Hazen Paper Co. v. BigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. WyomingSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Hedrick G. Humphries v. Cbocs West, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- Una Aline Gantt v. Wilson Sporting Goods CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Allen v. Highlands Hospital Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Roger COLLIER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the BUDD COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- William MULLIN, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. RAYTHEON COMPANY, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.