Legal Opinion
Travelers Insurance Co. v. Harrington
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided October 4, 1947No. 31605PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMacIntyre, P. J.
In his brief the plaintiff maintains that the petition shows that he was authorized to solicit the policy written by the defendant; that he did solicit the policy; that he was the procuring cause of the sale of the policy; and that the policy written originated from and was carried to a conclusion by the petitioner.
The plaintiff had no authority to make, alter, vary, or discharge any policy contract, but was' a soliciting or special agent with authority to solicit applications for insurance and to offer all such applications to the company. He was an agent of the defendant company. Globe &…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Douglas, Augusta & Gulf Railway Co. v. SwindleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Clinchy v. Grandview Dairy, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Globe & Rutgers Fire Insurance v. WalkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1920
- Sporl v. New York Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1932
- Lanowah Investment Co. v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- B. L. Ivey Construction Co. v. Pilot Fire & Casualty Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1968
- McFarland v. Business Men's Assurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Moreland v. KilgoreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
- Brewer v. General Accident, Fire & Life Assurance Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1970