Legal Opinion
Lanowah Investment Co. v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided May 25, 1942PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
On Behearing.
BLAND, J.
— Tbe following portions of tbe opinion of Cave, J., delivered on tbe original submission of tbe ease are adopted by tbe court on rebearing:
“This is a suit by plaintiff to collect a commission for a premium paid on an insurance policy issued by tbe defendant to one J. 0. Price. Tbe case was tried to a jury, resulting in a verdict for tbe plaintiff in tbe sum of $300, and after tbe overruling of. defendant’s motion for a new trial and in arrest of judgment, tbe cause was duly, appealed to this court. For convenience tbe parties will be referred to as plaintiff and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Cole v. ArmourSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
- Whipple v. . Prudential Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Elwell v. State Mutual Life Assurance Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
- Gaines v. Berkshire Life InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1933
- Weisels-Gerhardt Real Estate Co. v. Pemberton Investment Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1910
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Baker v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
- Voss v. American Mutual Liability Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1960
- Keeshan v. Embassy Investment CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
- Distassio v. American United Life InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1944
- Rosenbloom v. New York Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1947
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.