Legal Opinion

Lanowah Investment Co. v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 25, 1942PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On Behearing.

BLAND, J.

— Tbe following portions of tbe opinion of Cave, J., delivered on tbe original submission of tbe ease are adopted by tbe court on rebearing:

“This is a suit by plaintiff to collect a commission for a premium paid on an insurance policy issued by tbe defendant to one J. 0. Price. Tbe case was tried to a jury, resulting in a verdict for tbe plaintiff in tbe sum of $300, and after tbe overruling of. defendant’s motion for a new trial and in arrest of judgment, tbe cause was duly, appealed to this court. For convenience tbe parties will be referred to as plaintiff and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Cole v. ArmourSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
  2. Whipple v. . Prudential Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
  3. Elwell v. State Mutual Life Assurance Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  4. Gaines v. Berkshire Life InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1933
  5. Weisels-Gerhardt Real Estate Co. v. Pemberton Investment Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1910

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Baker v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. Voss v. American Mutual Liability Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1960
  3. Keeshan v. Embassy Investment CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
  4. Distassio v. American United Life InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1944
  5. Rosenbloom v. New York Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1947

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API