Legal Opinion
Chicago Cable Communications v. Chicago Cable Commission
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided July 19, 1989No. 88-1195PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CUMMINGS, Circuit Judge.
The Chicago Cable Commission (the “Commission”), pursuant to Chapter 113.1 of the Municipal Code of Chicago, regulates the franchising of all cable television services for the City of Chicago. Plaintiffs in this case are three affiliated cable television service corporations, Chicago Cable Communications, South Chicago Cable, Inc., and Communications and Cable of Chicago, Inc. (collectively herein “CCTV” for “Chicago Cable TV”). They were fined $60,750 collectively by the Commission for allegedly violating the “local origination” (“LO”) provisions of their identical…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Basim Esmail, Zabco Enterprises, Incorporated, and Nazco Enterprises, Incorporated v. Samuel T. MacRane Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Robert Horton, Nationalist Television, a Texas Non-Profit Corporation and Barry Hackney v. City of Houston, Texas and Access Houston Cable CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- Daniels Cablevision, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1993
- In Re Pettibone Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994
- In Re Dartmoor Homes, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.