Legal Opinion
Daniels Cablevision, Inc. v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 16, 1993No. Civ.A. 92-2292, 92-2494 and 92-2558PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JACKSON, District Judge.
The plaintiffs in these three lawsuits present facial constitutional challenges to eleven provisions of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Pub.L. No. 102-385, 106 Stat. 1460, and to two provisions of the Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984, Pub.L. No. 98-549, 98 Stat. 2780 (“the Cable Act” or “Acts”), contending that, for sundry reasons, these provisions infringe upon their First Amendment right to freedom of speech. 1 No other infirmities are alleged in these actions, however, and the Court is therefore not…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Comcast Corp. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- Time Warner Entertainment Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
- Cable Vision System Corp. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
- Time Warner Entertainment Co., L.P. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Goldstein v. Time Warner New York City Cable GroupDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.