Legal Opinion

In re the Arbitration between Delma Engineering Corp. & K & L Construction Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1957PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSamuel W. Eager, J.

This is a motion alleged to he made pursuant to provisions of section 1452 of the Civil Practice Act for appointment of an arbitrator to arbitrate an alleged controversy arising between the parties to a construction subcontract. The provisions of the contract with relation to arbitration were as follows: ‘ ‘ Any controversy or claim arising out of, or relating to, this Subcontract or the breach thereof, shall be settled by arbitration, in accordance with the Rules of the New York Building Congress, Inc., and judgment upon the award rendered may be entered in any Court having jurisdiction…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Marchant v. Mead-Morrison Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. In re the Arbitration between Riverdale Fabrics Corp. & Tillinghast-Stiles Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1954
  3. Hartigan v. . Casualty Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1919

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Arbitration between Delma Engineering Corp. & K & L Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API