Legal Opinion

State v. Simpson

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided March 3, 1987No. 16402PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURNETT, Judge.

We are asked to decide whether, in the circumstances of this case, the Fourth Amendment permits a law enforcement officer to stop a motor vehicle for the purpose of warning against violations of misdemeanor statutes. The issue is presented by Jimmy Simpson, who has appealed a judgment of conviction for driving under the influence of alcohol. Simpson entered a conditional plea of guilty after a magistrate denied his motion to suppress evidence obtained when an officer stopped his vehicle. Simpson contended that the stop was an unconstitutional seizure. The magistrate’s ruling on…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. United States v. HensleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Henry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. Fare v. Tony C.California Supreme Court · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. GodwinIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. ReedIdaho Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. State v. WheelerIdaho Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. State v. GasconIdaho Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. State v. RodriguezIdaho Court of Appeals · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API