Legal Opinion

State v. Godwin

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1992No. 19223PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAKES, Chief Justice.

Appellant Robert Godwin entered a conditional plea of guilty to the charge of possession of a controlled substance, reserving the right to appeal the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court’s decision to deny God-win’s motion to suppress. 121 Idaho 517, 826 P.2d 478. We granted Godwin’s petition for review of the Court of Appeals decision and now affirm.

The Court of Appeals described the facts as follows:

The facts of this case began during the late evening hours of April 14, 1989, when Officer Chris…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. State v. TourtillottOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. HobsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1974

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. State v. DanielTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. WeaverIdaho Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. PageIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. ReynoldsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. GutierrezIdaho Court of Appeals · 2002

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API