Federal Trade Commission v. Direct Marketing Concepts, Inc.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
O’TOOLE, District Judge.
The Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) brought this action to remedy violations by the defendants of sections 5(a) and 12 of the Federal Trade Commission Act (“FTC Act”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 45, 52, in connection with the production and dissemination of two “infomercials” — one marketing a prod uct known as “Coral Calcium Daily” (“Coral Calcium”) and the other marketing a product known as “Supreme Greens with MSM” (“Supreme Greens”). All substantive liability questions were previously resolved essentially in the FTC’s favor on its motion for summary judgment…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance v. KnudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- In re R. M. J.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- In Re RMJSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. Bronson Partners, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Federal Trade Commission v. Commerce Planet, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2012
- Fed. Trade Comm'n v. Omics Grp. Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2019
- State of Vermont v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.Vermont Superior Court · 2013