Legal Opinion

Van Tassell v. Jefferson County

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 1919PublishedCited by 15 opinions

From Jefferson: T. E. J. Duffy, Judge. In Banc. On motion to affirm judgment.

1Opinion of the Court

PEB CURIAM.

1. This is a motion by defendants to affirm the judgment because of failure of plaintiff to *601file Ms abstract and brief, as required by Eules 6 and 8 of this court.

Plaintiff filed Ms transcript on appeal on August 16, 1918. His time for filing an abstract expired September 5, 1918, and there has been no extension granted, nor is any excuse offered for failure to file the abstract and briefs as required by our rules.

Defendants move the court for an affirmance of the judgment, as provided in Eule 16, and it is so ordered, with costs against plaintiff. Affirmed on Motion.

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Leadbetter v. PriceOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Sturtevant v. SturtevantOregon Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Gildersleeve v. LeeOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Fields v. FieldsOregon Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Imbrie v. HartrampfOregon Supreme Court · 1921

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API