Legal Opinion
Chan v. Reno
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 13, 1998No. 95 Civ. 2586(RWS)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
The plaintiffs, nationals of the People’s Republic of China who entered the United States without inspection or parole (the “Plaintiffs”), have moved pursuant to Rules 15(a) and 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for leave to amend their Complaint and for summary judgment. Defendant, the Attorney General of the United States (the “Government”), cross-moves for summary judgment. The Plaintiffs allege that (1) the Immigration and Naturalization Service (the “INS”) regulation requiring applicants under the Chinese Student Protection Act of 1992 (the “CSPA”)…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- WANGBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2006
- Kai Wu Chan v. RenoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998