Legal Opinion
Kai Wu Chan v. Reno
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 22, 1998No. 95 Civ. 2586(RWS)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, J.
The plaintiffs, nationals of the People’s Republic of China who entered the United States without inspection or parole (the “Plaintiffs”), have moved pursuant to Local Civil Rule 6.3 to reargue the Court’s opinion dated January 13, 1998, denying the Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment and granting the defendant’s, the Attorney General of the United States (the “Government”), cross-motion for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs’ motion is denied.
The Parties
Plaintiffs are nationals of the People’s Republic of China (the “PRC”) residing in the United…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Morse/Diesel, Inc. v. Fid. & Deposit Co. of MarylandDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Caleb & Co. v. E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Fulani v. BradyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Ameritrust Co. National Ass'n v. DewDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- American Alliance Insurance v. Eagle InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- WANGBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2006