Legal Opinion

Puffer Manufacturing Co. v. Krum

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 21, 1911PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeCourcy, J.

On June 28,1906, the defendant signed and delivered to one Wood, a travelling salesman of the plaintiff corporation, an order for a soda fountain and apparatus. The order *212described in detail the goods, the price and terms of payment. It contained no warranty of quality in material or workmanship. In the margin were printed the words: “ There are no agreements with your salesman except those herein stated and no claim will be made by me for anything not specified herein.” It was taken by the salesman subject to the approval of the plaintiff.

The plaintiff completed the fountain which was a <£…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mears v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  2. Hodgkins v. MoultonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  3. Wentworth v. DowsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  4. Jackman v. DolandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  5. Neale v. American Electric Vehicle Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jones v. Revere Preserving Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  2. MacAlman v. GleasonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  3. Wessinger v. H. Werner Sons Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  4. Benford Manufacturing Co. v. Standard Tire & Rubber Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  5. Loomer v. HarlowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API