Loomer v. Harlow
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtDe Courcy, J.
These' are cross actions arising out of a written agreement for the erection of a building, made between the parties Loomer and Allen, hereinafter called the contractors, and Frank S. Harlow the owner. It was agreed therein that the contractors should “provide all the materials and perform all the work for the erection and completion of a frame apartment building ... as required by them as general contractors, as shown on the drawings and described in the specifications” prepared by the architects.
The principal question in dispute between the parties is whether the contractors were bound by…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bowen v. KimbellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Butterick Publishing Co. v. FisherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Farquhar v. FarquharMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Allen v. BurnsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Daly v. KingstonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- O'BRIEN v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
- Benford Manufacturing Co. v. Standard Tire & Rubber Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920