Legal Opinion

Lisa Romain v. Marketa Walters

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 8, 2017No. 16-30929PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAYNES, Circuit Judge:

The district court determined that Plaintiffs in this matter were not prevailing parties and denied recovery of attorneys’ fees. As discussed below, we REVERSE and REMAND.

I. Background

Plaintiffs Lisa Romain, Stacey Gibson, Joanika Davis, Schevelli Robertson, Jericho Macklin, Dameion Williams, and Brian Trinchard are residents of Louisiana who qualify for benefits under the Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program (“SNAP”). 1 Plaintiffs relied on a state-wide waiver to meet the “work requirement,” which is one of many requirements an individual must meet in order to…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Texas State Teachers Ass'n v. Garland Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Independent Federation of Flight Attendants v. ZipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Crystal Davis v. Credit Bureau of the SouthCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
  2. Nelson Arce v. Louisiana StateCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
  3. Amawi v. PaxtonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2022
  4. J. Ladley & C. Meier v. PSEACommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
  5. Lisa Romain v. Marketa WaltersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API