Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lisa Romain v. Marketa Walters

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 26, 2017No. 16-30929Published

1Dissent

EDITH BROWN CLEMENT, Circuit Judge, joined by JONES, SMITH, and OWEN, Circuit Judges,

dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc.

The panel’s reversal of the district court’s denial of attorney’s fees rests on a faulty prevailing party analysis. Under 42 U.S.C. § 1988, a district court “in its discretion, may allow the prevailing party ... a reasonable attorney’s fee as part of the costs.” “[T]o achieve prevailing party status, a party must achieve some judicially sanctioned relief that either creates or materially alters a legal relationship between the parties.” Petteway v. Henry, 738…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Dearmore v. City of GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
  3. Terry Petteway v. Mark HenryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
  4. Lisa Romain v. Marketa WaltersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API