Carlin v. DairyAmerica, Inc.
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ RENEWED MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
ANTHONY W. ISHII, Senior District Judge.
In this action in diversity for damages, defendants Dairy America, Inc. (“DairyAmerica”) and California Dairies, Inc. (“California Dairies”) (collectively “Defendants”) moved on June 2, 2009, to dismiss the First Amended Complaint of Plaintiffs Gerald Carlin, John Rahm, Paul Rozwadowski, and Brian Wolfe (“Plaintiffs”). Defendants’ motion to dismiss alleged, among other defenses, that each of Plaintiffs’ claims is barred by the judicially-created “filed rate doctrine.” On…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Moss v. U.S. Secret ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Jenkins v. McKeithenSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Hospital Building Co. v. Trustees of Rex HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Colon v. NCAADistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- Courtesy Automotive Group, Inc. v. Subaru of America, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2023
- Kenner v. Bitterroot Timber Frames, LLCDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2022
- Kerkorian v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2019
- Smart v. NCAADistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023