Legal Opinion

Kerkorian v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided December 19, 2019No. 1:18-cv-00870Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PAUL KERKORIAN, on behalf of himself No. 1:18-cv-00870-DAD-SKO and all others similarly situated, 12 Plaintiff, 13 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S v. MOTION TO DISMISS 14 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, (Doc. No. 13) 15 INC., 16 Defendant. 17 18 This matter is before the court on a motion to dismiss brought on behalf of defendant 19 Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (“Samsung” or “defendant”). (Doc. No. 13.) A hearing on 20 the motion was held on October 2, 2018.1 Attorney Christopher Nichols appeared…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Lee v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  2. Kearns v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. NORTH STAR INTERNATIONAL, a Nevada Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION, Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  4. Vess v. Ciba-Geigy Corp. USACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  5. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API