Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. City of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1938No. Docket No. 18, Calendar No. 40,136PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPotter, J.

Plaintiff brought suit to recover the amount of four instalments of a special assessment alleged to have been illegally levied against his property (lot 148 of J. W. Johnston’s subdivision in the city of Detroit), and interest thereon. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

Defendant decided to build a crosstown thoroughfare, known as Vernor highway, and where it crossed Twenty-second street opened a new street for which the city condemned many parcels of private property, among them being lot 147 of Johnston’s subdivision, on the east side of Twenty-second street, though only the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Panfil v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Emmons v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Linski v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Emmons v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Troy v. BarnardMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Nelson Drainage District v. FilippisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API