Legal Opinion

Emmons v. City of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1931No. Docket No. 13, Calendar No. 35,478PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On Rehearing.

Potter, J.

This case was before the court in Emmons v. City of Detroit, 255 Mich. 558, to which reference is made for a further statement of facts. Application for a rehearing was had and granted, and the case is here on resubmission. In the opinion above referred to it was said:

“It must be assumed that the land not actually used by the street, but acquired by condemnation between plaintiff’s land and the traveled portion of the street, was acquired in pursuance of the Constitution and statutes.”

Attention had been called to the constitutional amendment of 1928 providing that in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Emmons v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Linski v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Wichita Falls v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  2. Armstrong v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Vetal v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Wikman v. City of NoviMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Wikman v. City of NoviMichigan Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API