Legal Opinion

Clark v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 16, 1936No. 18548PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KRUEGER, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of being an accomplice to the offense of burglary, and hijs punishment was assessed at confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of two years.

Appellant’s first contention is that the court erred in overruling his motion to quash the indictment. Looking to the indictment in the light of the objections urged thereto, we are of the opinion that it is sufficient to charge the offense. It *403appears to follow the forms heretofore approved by this court.

Appellant next challenges the sufficiency of the testimony to justify the conviction. In…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Graves v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1933

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Almazan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1940
  2. McCarty v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API