Clark v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
KRUEGER, Judge.
Appellant was convicted of the offense of being an accomplice to the offense of burglary, and hijs punishment was assessed at confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of two years.
Appellant’s first contention is that the court erred in overruling his motion to quash the indictment. Looking to the indictment in the light of the objections urged thereto, we are of the opinion that it is sufficient to charge the offense. It *403appears to follow the forms heretofore approved by this court.
Appellant next challenges the sufficiency of the testimony to justify the conviction. In…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Graves v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1933
3Cited by2 opinions
- Almazan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1940
- McCarty v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1942