Legal Opinion · Dissent

Kocinski v. Home Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided November 29, 1988No. 87-1640Published

1DissentMoser, P.J.

I dissent. Because there is no clear factual dissertation in the majority opinion, I will supply the chronological data needed for an understanding of the one simple issue on this appeal. That issue is whether at any time a binding settlement agreement had been reached between Alice H. Kocinski and the City of Milwaukee.

9/3/82 Kocinski was injured in a boating accident which occurred on the Milwaukee River.

11/18/83 Kocinski filed a statutory claim1 for injury against the City of Milwaukee.

8/24/84 Kocinski sued the City, alleging negligence in the placement, operation, and control of a barge…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Wisconsin's Environmental Decade, Inc. v. Department of Natural ResourcesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Pugnier v. RamharterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Kukuska v. Home Mutual Hail-Tornado InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Thayer v. Federal Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Mullen v. CoolongCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API