Kukuska v. Home Mutual Hail-Tornado Insurance
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRosenbeRRY, C. J.
Under the circumstances disclosed by the evidence in this case, the transaction should be treated as if the plaintiff had paid the agent Grimm the policy fee and premium in cash. Grimm extended credit in accordance with the usual course of business between him and the plaintiff and it was treated as a cas'h transaction.
*170The question presented for solution is, under the circumstances of this case, was defendant liable to the plaintiff in damages? As indicated by the trial court, the weight of authority undoubtedly is that an insurer may be held liable under such circumstances in the amount of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Duffie v. Bankers' Life Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
- Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. NeafusCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
- Boyer v. State Farmers' Mutual Hail InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
- National Union Fire Insurance v. School District No. 55Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
- Savage v. Prudential Life Ins. Co. of AmericaMississippi Supreme Court · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Barrera v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Bekken v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1940
- Zayc v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- American Life Insurance v. NaborsTexas Supreme Court · 1934
- Harding v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1939
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.