Chiles v. Ceridian Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LUCERO, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs, a certified class of employees who receive benefits under a long term disability plan, appeal from summary judgment denying them health care benefits under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. (“ERISA”). The issues presented are whether the plaintiffs have vested rights to company-paid health insurance as long as they remain disabled and, if not, whether the plan administrator had sufficient reason to change the plan and require the covered employees to pay their own premiums for coverage. The district court found that…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Nachman Corp. v. Pension Benefit Guaranty CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. SchoonejongenSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (Uaw), and Local 134, Uaw v. Yard-Man, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- Martin Hansen, Cross-Appellee v. The Continental Insurance Company and Commercial Insurance Company of Newark, New Jersey, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fulghum v. Embarq Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 2013
- Barker v. Ceridian CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Kent P. Barker v. Ceridian Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- 22 Employee Benefits Cas. 1403, Pens. Plan Guide (Cch) P 23926e Leo W. Chiles, Gloria Herren, Helen L. Byrd, Joy L. Oleo, Phyllis McMillan Robert D. Hunter, Barbara Jeffries, Glorice Biglow, Jacqueline Steele v. Ceridian Corporation Seagate Technologies, Foreign CorporationsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Sollars v. Healthcare RecoveriesCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2006