Legal Opinion
Barker v. Ceridian Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided August 26, 1997No. 96-2429PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
122 F.3d 628
21 Employee Benefits Cas. 2456
Kent P. BARKER; Carla J. McAndrews; Martin J. Timmons, on
behalf of themselves and all others similarly
situated, Plaintiffs--Appellants,
v.
CERIDIAN CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, individually
and as successor in interest to Control Data
Corporation, Defendant--Appellee.
No. 96-2429.
United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 13, 1997.
Decided Aug. 26, 1997.
John Murray, Minneapolis, MN, argued, Matthew B. Newman, Edina, MN (Terrence M. Fruth, Paul M. Floyd, on the brief), for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
Richard A. Kaplan, Minneapolis, MN,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. SchoonejongenSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Kenneth P. Bidlack v. Wheelabrator CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- In Re Unisys Corp. Retiree Medical Benefit "Erisa" Litigation. Gerald E. Pickering, Fred Tonnies, William Leonhardt, Evelyn Schmidt, Dudley Keyes, David Kahl, Paul Wright, Robert Wilt, Clay Bernichon, Edward Valle, Robert B. Welsh, Solveig Tschann, Bernard J. Jansen, Donald I. Klippenstein, Frederick W. Hoppe, Ludson F. Worsham, Edwin Marjala and Warren Hall, Individually and on Behalf of All Members of the Sperry Class Previously Certified by the Court Whose Claims Have Not Been SettledCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Halbach v. Great-West Life & Annuity Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2007
- Kent P. Barker Carla J. McAndrews Martin J. Timmons, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Ceridian Corporation, a Delaware, Corporation, Individually and as Successor in Interest to Control Data CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999